Safety screening
Safety screening
What screening language is needed before contact repair, enforcement, or timeline pressure is applied?
ABUSE-SAFETY REVIEW
Does the draft preserve safety while addressing process harm?
This lane asks safety, child-protection, coercive-control, and trauma-informed reviewers to find language that could be misused, overread, or underprotective.
Good-faith reports
Good-faith reports
How should the draft protect good-faith safety concerns while still addressing knowingly false or bad-faith tactics?
Trauma and fear
Trauma and fear
Where must trauma, fear, coercive control, and child development be explicitly preserved?
Stop conditions
Stop conditions
What facts should pause, redirect, or require professional review before a remedy proceeds?
Suggested output
Suggested output
Provide specific safeguards, definitions, exceptions, and review triggers that reduce foreseeable harm.
No private intake
Keep feedback public-policy focused.
Do not send child names, allegations, medical files, school records, sealed filings, confidential court documents, or identifying private case narratives. Use public-process examples, anonymized patterns, sources, and proposed language.
Legal boundary
Public education, not legal advice
FOCaF materials can help families organize questions, dates, documents, and next steps. They do not create an attorney-client relationship and do not replace advice from a qualified professional.
Safety boundary
Safety overrides site content
If someone is in immediate danger, use emergency and crisis resources first. Do not use this site to submit private allegations, child names, sealed records, medical files, or confidential court materials.
Child-first boundary
Children should not carry adult conflict
Tools are designed to reduce adult confusion and pressure, not to make children document adult disputes, choose sides, or act as messengers.